After two "snow days" and a weekend, the Legislature jumped back into action yesterday. In meetings stretching from 7
a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday, committees continued hearings and debated bills with this
Friday’s “turnaround” deadline looming. All
meetings scheduled for today have been pushed back two hours as snow continues
to fall in Topeka. Here is a
committee-by-committee report.
House Education:
Innovative Districts. At its 7:00 a.m. session, the
committee voted to recommend HB 2319
favorably on a voice vote. The bill would
allow up to 10 districts to become “innovative districts” with approval from
the State Board of Education by setting higher student completion standards for
college and career-readiness. These
districts could then exempt themselves from most state school laws by action of
the local board. KASB supports the
bill. It is opposed by the Kansas
National Education Association because it would allow districts to be exempted
from certain laws concerning teachers: continuing contracts, due process and
professional negotiations. The committee
rejected amendments from Rep Valdenia Winn, D-Kansas City, which would have
struck the provision allowing exemptions from most school laws, and from Rep
Nancy Lusk, D-Overland Park, which would have removed exemptions from the three
teacher laws.
Special Needs Scholarships (Vouchers). After extensive
debate, a motion to report HB 2263 failed
on an unrecorded, but apparently 8-10, vote.
The bill would have established a state scholarship program for students
with special education IEPs that would provide state money from school
districts to be spent at private schools.
The bill was amended twice, but the discussion generally raised more
questions than the one the committee could answer. KASB strongly opposed the bill, raising concerns
about its constitutionality, compliance with federal special education law, and
financial impact on school districts.
Although the vote was not
recorded, it appeared the committee members voting for the bill were: John
Bradford, R-Lansing; Willie Dove, R-Bonner Springs; Amanda Grosserode, R-Lenexa;
Kelly Meigs, R-Lenexa; Jerry Lunn, R-Overland Park; Ron Highland, R-Wamego; Shanti
Gandhi, R-Topeka; and Dennis Hedke, R-Wichita.
Apparently voting against the bill were Diana Dierks, R-Salina; Nancy
Lusk, D-Overland Park; John Ewy, R-Jetmore; Barbara Ballard, D-Lawrence, who
was appointed to the committee for the day; Sue Boldra, R-Hays; Ward Cassidy,
R-St. Francis; Ed Trimmer, D-Winfield; Valdenia Winn, D-Kansas City; Roderick Houston,
R-Wichita; and Melissa Rooker, R-Fairway.
Remember, these are not official votes.
You would have to contact the representatives to ask how they actually
voted and why.
Teacher Liability Insurance. Late in the
day, the committee passed HB 2232,
which would direct the State Board to arrange for the purchase of liability
insurance for teachers. It was amended
to instruct the State Board to coordinate with each unified school district to
provide liability insurance. KASB took
no position.
Celebrate Freedom Week. Also Monday,
the committee held a hearing on HB 2280,
which establishes the week that includes September 17 each year as Celebrate
Freedom week, and directs the State Board of Education to include the study of
certain historic documents in history/government standards. After a long discussion and a few minor
amendments, it passed out on a voice vote.
There were a number of expressions of turning it into a resolution, but
the failed at the end. KASB took no
position on the bill.
Senate Education:
Read to Succeed/Grade Retention. The committee
held a hearing on SB 169, which
contains Governor Brownback’s three-part reading initiative. KASB focused on the first part, which would
require all districts to adopt a policy, beginning in 2917, that a student who
failed to score at the lowest level on the third grade state reading assessment
or an alternative assessment approved by the State Board of Education may not
be promoted to fourth grade until demonstrating that level of proficiency. There are various exceptions to this policy,
which makes it difficult to estimate how many students might be affected. In addition, the State Board will be adopting
new assessments and performance levels over the two years under the No Child
Left Behind waiver.
KASB stressed there is still
not enough evidence to determine the long-term benefits or risks of mandatory
grade-level retention, and noted the State of Florida, which has the longest
record of such a program, ranks well below Kansas student performance,
including for various subgroups. KASB
opposed requiring such a policy for all districts, but suggested it be
considered an intervention for schools or districts that fail to make progress
under the new accountability system.
KASB supported the parts of the bill that provide funding for reading
interventions. The bill also provides
for incentive payments to top achieving schools. Also opposing the bill were the Kansas National
Education Association, Kansas City USD 500 and Topeka USD 501. Wichita USD 259
appeared as neutral.
The committee took no action
on the bill, but it may be considered today.
Dyslexia Services. After reviewing several amendments
presented by committee Chair Sen. Steve Abrams, R-Arkansas City, to address
concerns raised in testimony, no motion was offered to either amend or
recommend SB 44. KASB opposes the bill as introduced as a potentially
expensive new mandate that also exceeds the requirements of federal special
education law. Unless action occurs
today, that will likely end discussion on the bill this session.
Career Technical Education. The committee approved SB 128 on a voice vote. The
bill would allow CTE students until December following the year they graduate to
complete national certification in certain high demand areas that result in
$1,000 incentive payments to school districts (and also help pay the cost of
assessments in these areas). KASB did
not testify on the bill, but is supportive.
Capital Outlay. The committee also reviewed several amendments
to SB 131, which would expand the
allowable use of capital outlay funds, but after several members expressed
concerns about the bill it was passed over.
Some of those concerns reflected KASB’s testimony on the bill. KASB appeared as neutral, offering support
for the concept of broader capital outlay uses, but only if capital outlay
state aid equalization aid is restored.
KASB stressed the Gannon
district court has ruled the entire capital outlay system is unconstitutional
without state aid.
School District Financial Reporting. The committee
took up but did not finish discussion of SB
171, which would add several new requirements to financial data districts
must report to the state and post on their websites, particularly in the area
of student activities. KASB opposes the
bill for imposing additional costs on districts.
This afternoon, the committee
is scheduled to hold a hearing and take possible action on SB 172, which would prohibit the use of Carnegie units for graduation
requirements. KASB will testify in
support of the concept of moving away from “seat time” based requirements, but
propose delaying the effective date to allow a new system to be developed at
the state and local level. The committee
could take action on the bill today.
Other bills available for
committee consideration today included: SB
103 – redefining at-risk pupil, and SB
176 – creating the coalition of innovative districts act.
House Education Budget Committee
Local Activities Budget. The committee
held a hearing on HB 2248, which
would allow districts spending below the statewide average budget per pupil to
adopt a mill levy to finance student activities and other programs not required
by the state. The levy would require a
public vote for approval and no state equalization aid would be provided. KASB testified in opposition based on the
lack of equalization, but testified in support of a three-part package of
increasing base state aid per pupil, the maximum local option budget and LOB equalization
aid. The committee could take action the
bill this afternoon.
Mandatory LOB. The committee then turned to HB 2003, which would require each
district to adopt a 10% local option budget (which all districts already have)
that would be used to calculate a high base budget per pupil. The purpose is to aid the state in defending
itself in the current school finance lawsuit.
KASB opposed the bill because it proposes to show more state support of
education by LOB funding without addressing the underfunding of LOB
equalization. After reviewing a
print-out of the bill’s impact on school districts, the committee took no
action.
The committee is expected to
continue to discuss HB 2003 when it
meets today at 5:30 p.m. Also available for
possible action is HB 2215, which
restores the threshold for transporting certain non-resident students from 2.5
miles to 10 miles. KASB supports the
bill.
House Taxation:
Machinery and Equipment Tax. KASB joined a
long list of local government representatives in opposing HB 2285, which would reduce taxes on certain commercial equipment
or “trade fixtures” currently taxed as real, rather than personal,
property. The bill would reduce the tax
base for both the state and local units of government, resulting in either less
revenue or higher taxes on other property, mainly residential. The committee could take action today.
Other Action in the Statehouse:
The Senate Ways and Means
Committee is scheduled to take up the Governor’s budget for the Department of
Education today, including school district state aid. The education subcommittee essentially
adopted the Governor’s proposals to keep most K-12 level, with some increase in
general state aid this to keep the base at $3,838 and formula increases for KPERS
contributions and capital improvement bond and interest aid.
The House voted 120-0 to
passed HB 2261, which makes
permanent the ability of districts to make transfers from certain restricted
funds for general education purposes, and removes any limit on the district
contingency fund. KASB supports, the
bill which was referred to the Senate Education Committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment
(Comments on this blog are moderated.)