Key Points:
Short-term results: for Kansans aged
18-24 - the age group most recently in our public schools - the numbers who
have completed high school, participated in postsecondary education and
completed a four-year degree have increased more than the population
increase.
Long-term results: the percent of Kansans age
25 and over reaching higher educational levels have improved since 1990,
especially in terms of postsecondary education. Education levels have been
steadily increasing since the Census began reporting data in 1940.
Because Kansans with higher educational
attainment earn substantially more, the improved education levels since 1990
equal almost $7 billion in additional earnings in 2017, compared to what
earnings would be at 1990 levels – more than the entire amount spent on K-12
education.
The same calculation also means increased
education levels equals a reduction of nearly 40,000 Kansas in poverty, or
18.5%.
Conclusion: As funding has increased, school districts
have invested in programs and staff that have helped more students complete
high school, participate in postecondary education, and reach higher
education levels. This, in turn, increases earnings and reduces poverty. That's
why K-12 funding an investment that returns long-term
benefits greater than the cost.
In depth
The latest update from the U.S. Census
Bureau’s American Community Survey contains state estimates of educational
levels, earning and poverty for 2017. The data shows Kansas educational levels
have reached all-time high levels. This is important context for considering
Kansas school funding, which has also increased over the long term.
First, short-term results. Consider Kansans
aged 18-24 - the age group most recently in public schools. The numbers who
have completed high school, participated in postsecondary education and
completed a four-year degree have increased more than the population
increase.
The number of Kansans in this age group
increased by about 35,000 between 2005 and 2017. The number of young adults
with any postsecondary participation, up to completion of a two-year degree,
increased by 31,000 and those completing a four-year degree or more increased
by over 5,000. The number of only a high school degree was almost unchanged,
the number who had not completed high school dropped.
Next, long-term results. Since 1990, the percent of Kansans age 25 and over reaching higher educational levels has improved, especially in terms of postsecondary education. Kansans with at least a high school diploma increased from 8 in 10 to over 9 in 10.
Kansans with any postsecondary education,
from a few credits to a one- or two-year degree or certificate, to four years
and beyond, increased from less than one-half to almost two thirds, and those
with a four-year or advance degree increased just over 20 percent to nearly 34 percent.
These continue long-term trends for almost 80
years. Census data has reported high school completion and four-year degree
completion since 1940. At that time, only bout about one-third of Kansans had
completed high school and only five percent of Kansas had a four-year degree.
Next, consider the impact on this change on
Kansas economic well-being. Because Kansans with higher educational
attainment earn substantially more, the improved education levels since 1990
equal almost $7 billion in additional earnings, compared what earnings would be
at 1990 levels – more than the entire amount spent on K-12 education.
The same calculation also means increased
education levels equals a reduction of nearly 40,000 Kansas in poverty, or
18.5%.
Conclusion: This information is a measurement
of how the Kansas public school system has been accomplishing its constitutional
responsibility for intellectual, education, vocational and scientific improvement.
It also provides important context for school
funding discussions. It is sometimes suggested that there has been not much
change in Kansas educational outcomes, despite increased funding; with a further
suggestion that additional funding will not result in improved outcomes.
In fact, as recent KASB posts have discussed,
Kansas funding historically has increased more than inflation (except from 2010
through 2017). As funding increased, school districts have invested in programs
and staff that have helped more students complete high school, participate in
postecondary education, and reach higher education levels. This, in turn,
increases earnings and reduces poverty.
Although K-12 funding has increased more than
inflation, it has not increased at a faster rate than total personal income in
the state. That's why school leaders consider K-12 funding a classic example of
an investment, not simply an expense: “purchase of goods that are not consumed
today but are used in the future to create wealth.”
Improved educational outcomes create far more
than economic benefits: preparing students to be participate in democratic
institutions, improving health, understanding and appreciating cultural heritage
and the arts, to cite some of state’s educational goals (Rose capacities) set
by the Kansas Supreme Court and Legislature. But fundamentally, improving
education has both a cost and pay-back in long-term economic benefits.
No comments:
Post a Comment
(Comments on this blog are moderated.)